2021 Ford Bronco vs. Jeep Wrangler vs. Toyota 4Runner Spec Comparison

Which is bigger on the outside — Bronco, Wrangler or 4Runner?

Ford extends over the Wrangler range here. The two-door Bronco variant is noticeably larger than the Wrangler – 6.9-8.0 inches longer from the bumper to the rear-mounted spare on a 3.6-inch longer wheelbase and significantly 2.1-5.5 inches wider, but 1.7 inches shorter in height for the base model. The four-door Bronco is closer in size and measures a total of 1.0-2.1 inches longer than the Wrangler Unlimited on a 2.3-inch shorter wheelbase with a similar width and height difference as on the two-door. At the same time, the Toyota 4Runners’ overall length tops the Bronco four-door with 0.8-1.3 inches. But it’s for the bumper – its spare tires hang underneath – so there’s about a 10.5-inch more useful truck body on the 4Runners’ 6.3-inch shorter wheelbase (compared to the Bronco). The width is within a tenth of the Broncos base as well, so expect to see more “branch stripes” on either Ford or Toyota as you run down trails that are primarily flared up by Wranglers.

Exterior size — largest to smallest Wheelbase Length (in) Width (in) Height (in)
Ford Bronco (2-door) 100.4 173.7-174.8 75.9-79.3 71.9-73.8
Jeep Wrangler (2-door) 96.8 166.8 73.8 73.6
Ford Bronco (4-door) 116.1 189.4-190.5 75.9-79.3 72.9-75.3
Jeep Wrangler Unlimited 118.4 188.4 73.8 73.6
Toyota 4Runner 109.8 190.7-191.3 75.8 71.5-72.0

Which is bigger on the inside — Bronco, Wrangler or 4Runner?

If you buy two-door SUVs, what are you going to take with you? If it is mainly cargo and another front passenger, the Bronco is your best bet, with 83 percent more cargo space (seats up or down) and a little more leg and shoulder space at the front. Rear-seat passengers in the shorter Wrangler get 17 percent more rear-seat passenger space than in Bronco two-door, thanks to redundant head and shoulder space. In the sphere with four doors, the 4Runner has at least 12 cubes more cargo space – seats up or down – than in any of the others. But as the only vehicle here that can be obtained with an optional third row of seats, the 4Runner’s legroom on the second row is at least 3.4-5.4 inches, resulting in the front and rear passenger compartment being smaller than what you get in the car. two doors. (Choose the third row at $ 805 to add 30.8 cubic feet of passenger space, with 9.0 cubic feet of luggage space behind it.)

Interior space — largest to smallest Cargo Vol. (cu ft) Cargo Vol. (cu ft) Room front seat (inside) Room front seat (inside) Room front seat (inside) Rear seat (in) Rear seat (in) Rear seat (in) Pass. Vol. (cu ft) Pass. Vol. (cu ft) Pass. Vol. (cu ft)
Put up Puts down head bone sh’lder head bone sh’lder front rear total
Jeep Wrangler (2-door) 12.9 31.7 42.6 41.2 55.7 41.7 35.7 57.7 56.6 49.7 106.3
Ford Bronco (2-door) 23.6 58.4 41.7 41.6 57.1 39.8 35.7 51.8 57.3 42.6 99.9
Jeep Wrangler Unlimited 31.7 72.4 42.6 41.2 55.7 41.7 38.3 55.7 56.6 51.5 108.1
Ford Bronco (4-door) 35.6 77.6 40.8 41.6 57.1 40.1 36.3 56.4 56.1 47.5 103.6
Toyota 4Runner 47.2 89.7 38.6-39.3 41.7 57.8 38.6 32.9 57.8 53.8-54.8 42.5 96.3-97.3

2021 Ford Bronco Off-Road Capability vs Wrangler and 4Runner

The whole point of the next-generation, Ranger-derived 2021 Ford Bronco is to revive the desert-running and off-road heritage established by people like Off-Road Motorsports Hall of Famer Bill Stroppe. To that end, Ford has provided Bronco with class-leading credentials in this area and is planning a Raptor variant for the future; We keep our fingers crossed for a factory option for red-white-and-blue Strap racing delivery on it. Comparing the most terrain-optimized variants of each (Bronco Badlands with the Sasquatch package, Wrangler Rubicon and 4Runner TRD Pro), the Broncos’ 11.5-11.6-inch ground clearance is 0.7-2.0 inches larger than the others, and its ramp refraction and departure angles are also ranked best; Wrangler wins at approach angle. That large rear overhang that allows the 4Runner to hide its spare parts under the rear end costs it at least 11 degrees of departure angle; Toyota does not even publish a breakover and is the only one of these three that offers a rear-wheel drive alternative.

The more extreme of the new Broncos ‘two available transmissions gets a 3.06: 1 low range – well shy of the most capable Wranglers 4.00: 1 – but the Broncos’ seven-speed manual transmission has a super low “granny gear” first. It gives a creep ratio (first x low range x shoulder ratio) of 95: 1, up from the most striped Wranglers 84: 1. (4Runner has not offered a 20-year manual transmission, and the gear in its old five-speed automatic transmission is combined with relatively high gears with low range and axle ratio for a comparatively pitiful crawl ratio of 34: 1.) Is eager to get out on the rocks, the sand and mud marshes to compare different terrain modes, differential cabinets and stabilizer bar disconnection systems on Jeep and Ford, and to try the new Broncos Trail-Turn Assist, because on paper they seem pretty closely matched, with the Broncos’ biggest potential pioneering responsibility being its greater width .

Terrain capacity (most extreme variants) Ground clearance (in) Angle of incidence (degrees) Angle of refraction (degrees) Departure angle (degrees) Low interval transmission Maximum search ratio
Ford Bronco (2-door) 11.6 43.2 29.0 37.2 2.72: 1-3.06: 1 95: 1
Ford Bronco (4-door) 11.5 43.2 26.3 37.0 2.72: 1-3.06: 1 95: 1
Jeep Wrangler (2-door) 10.8 44.0 27.8 37.0 2.72: 1-4.00: 1 84: 1
Jeep Wrangler Unlimited 10.8 43.9 22.6 37.0 2.72: 1-4.00: 1 84: 1
Toyota 4Runner 9.6 33.0 NA 26.0 2.57: 1 34: 1

2021 Ford Bronco Power and Weight vs Wrangler and 4Runner

The weight information is not completely definitive on Bronco, but on paper, this truck’s turbo engine range seems ready to win some pink ties. Its 2.7-liter twin-turbo EcoBoost V-6 delivers 310 hp and 400 lb-ft; that is 15-40 hp more than what jeeps and Toyota can handle. At 400 lb-ft, the 2.7’s torque also tops everything except the mighty Jeep 3.0-liter EcoDiesel V-6 at 442 lb-ft. Toyota’s 4.0-liter antediluvian fails to top Jeep’s four-cylinder power and torque. Speaking of four-cylinder, Ford’s 2.3-liter EcoBoost turbo I-4 matches the 2.0-liter turbo-four Jeep with an output of 270 hp each while being the best at torque (310 lb-ft to 295). The only area where 4Runner wins a decisive win is in towing, where its £ 5,000 rating exceeds the others by £ 1,500.

Power, weight and towing Engine Size L) HP (SAE Network) Torque (lb-ft) Curb Wt. (lbs) Wt./Pwr (lb / hp) Towing (lbs)
Ford Bronco 2.7 V-6 double turbo 2.7 310 400 4 250-4 450 * 13.7-14.4 3 500
Jeep Wrangler 3.6 V-6 3.6 295 260 3 950-4 500 13.4-15.3 3 500
Ford Bronco 2.3 I-4 Turbo 2.3 270 310 3 950-4 150 * 14.6-15.4 3 500
Jeep Wrangler 2.0 I-4 Turbo ** 2.0 270 295 3 950-4 500 15.4-17.2 3 500
Toyota 4Runner V-6 4.0 270 278 4 400-4 800 16.3-17.8 5,000
Jeep Wrangler EcoDiesel V-6 turbodiesel 3.0 260 442 4 650-4 850 17.9-18.7 3 500
* Estimated, ** Available with eTorque mild-hybrid electrical assistance that does not change hp / lb-ft.

Leave a Comment